This
post comprises, by my computation, my third to last monthly column in statewide
papers as Vermont Poet Laureate. As
before, I will be taking the summer off from such columns, and my successor
will be named in November, this four-year tenure seeming to have gone by, like
most things at my age, in a matter of days.
On
the 28th of May, I visited the Vermont Arts Council headquarters,
where, with a group of peers, the process of choosing the next state poet
began. I cannot, of course, comment on the proceedings, but I can indulge in
some generalities, all of them connected to my somewhat melancholy recognition
that this intriguing ride will soon be over for me.
Let
me first applaud the intelligence, dedication, and good humor of the Arts
Council staff, from director Alex Aldrich and program director Michele Bailey
to everyone with whom I have dealt in that organization. Their very presence
makes me proud to be a Vermonter, to live in a state where the arts play such a
vital role not only in our economy but also in our daily lives. The Council’s
initiative and responsiveness have more to do with all that than many may
realize.
The
same can emphatically be said of my fellows on the committee, each so obviously
committed to getting this thing right, and taking the time necessary to achieve
that end.
And
yet, to speak again as a Vermont chauvinist, there surely will be no
indisputably right choice. As I looked over the list of nominees, most of whom
I know at least slightly, I was thrilled that our tiny state is home to so many
gifted artists– and dismayed that we’ll be able to choose only one.
Virtually
all of these authors were around at the time of my own appointment, which makes
me surprised all over again that I should have been chosen in 2011– and humbled
to know that I could scarcely have argued with any number of other selections.
I will participate in the final vote with a mixture of satisfaction and
frustration. With no false modesty, I can say that every nominee is him- or
herself a Poet Laureate in some measure, for it is our collective effort to say
things that are hard to say: it is that effort that keeps this cherished art
alive here and elsewhere. After my time as state poet, I will never view a poem
of my own as other than collaborative.
Speaking
of collaboration, I’d never have dreamed that I would write text for the
state’s first Cartoonist Laureate, the brilliant and gifted James Kochalka. We
have just completed our third project. The Vermont Contemporary Music ensemble,
having asked five of the state’s composers to write pieces in response to work
of mine, performed two luminous concerts as a result. The fabulous young
Philadelphia composer Joseph Hallman set my “Suite in Mudtime” to music
performed by soprano and string quartet (in this case Vermont’s own 802
Quartet) at the Vermont College of Fine Arts.
And
of course, still speaking of collaboration, whatever my contribution to
poetry’s health in Vermont may have been, it was merely an adjunct to the
contributions not only of the great Mr. Frost but also of the poets appointed
after the position was reinstated by Governor Kunin in 1988: Louise Gluck,
Galway Kinnell, Grace Paley, Ellen Bryant Voigt, and Ruth Stone. That I should
be part of that lineage frankly astounds me.
Yes,
I feel lucky. And even more, I feel blessed. If I was surprised by the
appointment, after these four years, I am scarcely surprised by how much I
regret its ending. So I have been in retrospective mode for a spell now,
thinking about all the other benefits –and I simply can’t name each one– that I
have experienced in this handful of years.
One
is the wit I have enjoyed. The first instance, in fact, transpired while I was
still on the phone with Alex Aldrich, who had called with the news. I put the
telephone to my chest and whispered “I’m the Poet Laureate!” My youngest
daughter, still living at home in 2011, corrected me: “It’s pronounced
low-rate.” But I have savored the funny remarks I have encountered at the
community libraries, 115 at this writing, where I have given presentations on
poetry. The proceedings at the three Montpelier spelling bees at which I have
been the pronouncer and emcee have at times been downright hilarious. I could
go on.
There
is likewise the cordiality I have experienced at virtually every stop. (The one
and only exception was an unhappy and unpleasant woman in the west of the state
who actually interrupted my reading of a poem by standing up and averring,
“That’s not poetry!” Her fellows, however, quickly shushed her.)
Librarians
are heroes of mine anyhow, from excellent state librarian Martha Reid to all
the librarians, in places tiny and grand and in between, in Vermont: to see the
care each took with making these events successful enhanced my feelings in this
regard, as did the welcome library patrons inevitably extended.
I
was regaled with all manner of thank you gifts, from home-baked pies to
chocolates to countless mugs (which for the most part I traitorously
transported to our Maine cabin in the woods) to precious books to –perhaps my
favorite—a salt dish carved from invasive buckthorn by one of the artisans at
Bob and Becca Cummings’s wonderful Center for the Expressive Arts in
Montgomery.
There
were several instances of pathos as well, chief of which was a woman’s giving
me a memorial card to her son, dead far too young, with an excerpt of my
writing as its inscription. I trust she understood my tears.
But
as I suspected would be the case when I decided on community libraries as my
venues of choice, I was most taken by the intelligence of so-called “average”
men and women in the crowds. I’m an Ivy League brat, but I learned well before
I got to college that that league had no corner on brains and/or creativity.
There’s a lot of smart people out there, whatever the nature of their formal
education.
I
met an inexcusably young man in Randolph who read my poems more penetratingly
than I could ever do myself. I came upon a dairy farmer way up on the Quebec
border who could recite –I quizzed him pretty thoroughly– every single poem in
Robert Frost’s “Mountain Interval.”
Again,
I could extend my catalog until I ran out of space. Suffice it to say that what
I valued most was how these non-specialists instinctively knew what the
important questions were, and how they asked them not, as is too often the case
in academic contexts, just to show how much they already knew themselves but in
fact to elicit such information as I had means to offer.
And
the important questions were and are often the most basic: who’s talking? to
whom” where are we? why choose form X rather than form Y? If my poems couldn’t
answer those questions, I suspected they needed further work (which quite a
number of them got).
As
I went on in my tenure, I came to leave more and more time for the Q & A
portion, because I was most interested in and most instructed by that portion.
To all of you who so brightly participated, my profoundest thanks.
Finally,
I am grateful to the editors of the newspapers in which these columns have been
published for four years now. They tolerated my opinions, and in many cases
helped me to make them clearer. And to those who have contacted me, either in
letters to the editor (again, one exception, but why dwell on that?) or
personally, my thanks too. You have both encouraged me and kept me as honest as
I know how to be.
May
you all have wonderful summers.